Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Projecis (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 14:45, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Projecis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Similar to what was decided at the previous AFD, I don't think that this company is notable per WP:CORP. I can't find any coverage in reliable sources since then. SmartSE (talk) 00:16, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nom seems to be right - and the page itself was created by a banned sockpuppet - could someone with admin access check if they were responsible for the original page please? Neonchameleon (talk) 00:29, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Blocked rather than banned... I checked before and the editor who created it last time doesn't appear linked to that group of socks. SmartSE (talk) 15:39, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Zero evidence of actual notability. DGG ( talk ) 08:13, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.