Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public image of Kamala Harris

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Closing all three of these nominations per the discussion at ANI, noting that the nominator has also been blocked for a week for conduct adjacent to these AfD's. This close explicitly does not preclude a discussion at a suitable venue (ie. article talk pages) about content forking/merging/etc. Daniel (talk) 14:15, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Public image of Kamala Harris

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Forks upon forks upon forks of Kamala Harris pages. should be deleted and merged back to the main page. Bohbye (talk) 05:40, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bohbye (talk) 05:40, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, United States of America, and California. Raladic (talk) 05:59, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Some of the content of the page didn't even come from the main article, so a merge back doesn't make sense. This is a notable WP:SUMMARY article on the public image including sub-topics such as KHive and merging it into the main article makes not sense on the basis of WP:SIZERULE (which only after the recent size-splits, all of which you decided to mass-nominate for deletion, has gotten back to readable size based on our guidelines). Raladic (talk) 06:11, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep - a reasonable split from her main article, if all three of these articles nominated for deletion were merged back into her main BLP, that would put the readable prose size at 13,000+ words which is too long to read and navigate comfortably. And my crystal ball predicts her main article will only get longer now with her candidacy for president. It's inevitable. It's a good thing these splits are being done early, instead of dragging our feet. Isaidnoway (talk) 09:53, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep per all of the above; this is a valid split to avoid bloating the main article. Left guide (talk) 10:25, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:40, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep: Quite aside from the comments given above, the nom has failed to proffer any rationale whatsoever for deletion/merger, let alone a valid one; newsflash, content forks are allowed on Wikipedia. Looks WP:POINTy to me. Ravenswing 12:10, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep: Considering how many other like articles exist under Category:Public image of American politicians, it would be in keeping with the norm. Among those already existing is Public image of Donald Trump. — Maile (talk) 12:28, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep: Per above. Also, see this related ANI thread. Bsoyka (t • c • g) 12:50, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep. This is another bad-faith AFD from this user who has now been blocked. Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:52, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep and close ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:06, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.