Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pump.fun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:23, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pump.fun

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poor quality sourcing, mostly relying on dubious crypto media sources. Likely not sufficient to meet WP:N. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 21:33, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 21:33, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Very little in RS, this [1] I suppose is a RS. The rest of what's in the article for sourcing is PR items or non-RS. I don't see notability at this time. Oaktree b (talk) 00:50, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:58, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No independent coverage for this crypto project per WP:NCRYPTO. The outrageous streaming content on the platform is gaining notoriety, but I can find only one RS hit for that.[2] • Gene93k (talk) 07:06, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While the subject is pretty notable in the crypto community, unfortunately the references used are not "mainstream" enough, i.e. no crypto news sites as required per WP:NCRYPTO. Decrypt isn't reliable enough for Wikipedia, and neither is CoinDesk. --Molochmeditates (talk) 18:06, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - One Bloomberg source is better than nothing, but the rest are garbage. I'm not seeing anything to suggest that better sources would have any reason to exist. Grayfell (talk) 06:29, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.