Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pyles Marsh, Georgia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:08, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pyles Marsh, Georgia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coordinates lead to a literal swamp/body of water. wizzito | say hello! 22:41, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. wizzito | say hello! 22:41, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. wizzito | say hello! 22:41, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:NGEO this might be a road.. Lightburst (talk) 00:48, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The only references to it I could find in a newspaper search were several railway schedules from the 1880s. I'm guessing this was either a railroad siding or at most a short-lived station, and the GNIS recorded it as a populated place rather than a locale, as it's done for so many other railroad locales in the western states. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 01:09, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's unclear what the name on the map refers to, but whatever it was doesn't seem to meet WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG. –dlthewave ☎ 20:53, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The marsh itself probably meets WP:GEOLAND, but this is about the supposed community; delete seems to be the only option. BilledMammal (talk) 01:21, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Glynn County, Georgia. Newspaper results show that this definitely existed. However, the only mentions of it are as a train stop in 1886 through 1888. The only subsequent coverage is in two passing mentions in 1893. jp×g 18:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NGEO. While I appreciate JPxG's source hunt, I'm not seeing how mentioning a train spot at this location in the county article isn't WP:Undue weight, and I'm not a fan of redirects to articles that don't mention the topic.4meter4 (talk) 00:07, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.