Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QuasarDB

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Enigma^msg 16:05, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

QuasarDB

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company and database of the same name. Article is entirely based on press releases, articles in associated websites and brief routine announcements about fundraisers. None of these sources establishes notability. A Google search did not reveal any independent detailed coverage about the company. GermanJoe (talk) 04:15, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Quasardb has been rejected in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quasardb just 3 months ago and is likely about the same topic (I don't have access to the deleted version to check either way). GermanJoe (talk) 04:15, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 04:16, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 04:16, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 04:16, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article about a company/product, consisting of information and media coverage of routine funding and partnership announcements. My searches are not finding any reason to overturn the March 2018 AfD consensus. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH as a company, WP:GNG as its database sproduct. AllyD (talk) 07:28, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable. Probably it is time to salt this. —Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 14:22, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I actually find independent coverage of the company: https://siliconangle.com/blog/2018/02/22/quasardb-lands-2-5m-seed-funding-super-fast-time-series-database/ http://fortune.com/2018/02/23/term-sheet-friday-february-23/ In addition, another company announced their work with QuasarDB: https://globenewswire.com/news-release/2018/01/19/1297971/0/en/Levyx-Signs-Fintech-OEM-QuasarDB-to-Bring-Unprecedented-Performance-to-Latency-Sensitive-Applications.html The CEO was also interviewd on National French TV: https://bfmbusiness.bfmtv.com/mediaplayer/video/what-s-up-new-york-quasardb-leve-25-millions-de-dollars-2102-1039227.html Lastly, the CEO spoke at a conference organized by Carnegie Mellon: https://db.cs.cmu.edu/events/time-series-database-lectures-edouard-alligand-quasardb/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdg2sfo (talk • contribs) 14:41, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.