Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quazal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Quazal

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure). Linguist^talk|contribs 23:38, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Quazal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable enough to warrant own article. redirect to Ubisoft -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 20:03, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

• Keep Company is very notable, and does not fail WP:SIGCOV. WP:VG's custom Google search hits just over 2500 results. As stated in my edit summary, there is more to come when I find the time to add, or someone does it for me. Lordtobi (✉) 20:07, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
• withdraw did not look notable previously, but on further look, looks good. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 20:19, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.