Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qutaylah bint Abd al-Uzza

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. -- Francs2000 | Talk 23:21, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Qutaylah bint Abd al-Uzza

Non-notable. No Google hits Denni ☯ 2005 July 3 23:40 (UTC)

Comment. There's a whole mess of these kinds of articles listed at Family tree of Abu Bakr ibn abu Qahafa. No clue on how important they are to Islam, but I'm guessing they ought to be merged somewhere, perhaps into Abu Bakr. No vote, pending information from someone who knows this stuff.
Delete non notable. JamesBurns 4 July 2005 01:27 (UTC)
Delete: I can't find a thing. --Alex12 3 4 July 2005 06:11 (UTC)
(Merge and) Redirect to Abu Bakr: seemingly notable only for having been his wife. - Mustafaa 4 July 2005 18:07 (UTC)

Not delet*. She is a shaba of Muhammad and has a strong part in Islam. i Understand that some might not know it, but she is very relevant. you did not get google hit since you did not search correctly: http://www.google.se/search?hl=sv&q=Qutaylah+bakr&btnG=Google-s%C3%B6kning&meta=

DO NOT DELET THIS! Its part of a bigger picture of making an article for manny sahabas. The information on them is thin and its hard to build on them, it takes a while to find information.

Give me a private message if you want me to elaborate, or take a look att this: [1] and this [2]. Make sure you read the second half of that.

--Striver 7 July 2005 21:56 (UTC)

update

articel is uppdated.

--Striver 8 July 2005 01:07 (UTC)

well it seems best not to delete the information, merging it with the Abu Bakr article seems fine, as that isn't too large itself, or a seperate article as it is does seems so also. Seeaxid 00:59, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

comment people, i can garantee you that the Abu Bakt article will not accept that info, it will be deleted on sight. I tried to add that Abu Bakr was beated by his cousin, but no chance, no way, Zora own that article now, "it ruines her prose"...

Man c'mon, its wikipedia, the info is relevant to her, some may read a book and add more to her biography... its not rubish, its a legit article!

Just cuz its not much to be said dosent mean its not worth saying! And the person IS notable, its Abu Bakrs former wife! it has a {expand} and a {stub}, what more do you whant? if EMD SW900 can have a article, why cant Abu Bakrs wife have one?

-Striver, with a sad face.... --Striver 01:19, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As it seems odd to have an article about two people on one page, and that it's historical, I would probably tend towards keeping it, although Mustafaa's point certainly seems valid. Seeaxid 10:50, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

comentIs being a wife a smal matter? Is it a smaler mater than being a train in a train series?

Delete Stupid terrorists

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.