Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RE: Alistair

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 13:59, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Alistair

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The GameZebo and Gamer Tell reviews are substantial pieces from reliable sources, but I couldn't find anything more. The other site used in the article seems to let anyone submit pieces for consideration through their forums. The Jay is Games review I found doesn't count towards notability and isn't usable in the article because it's by another contributor besides the eponymous Jay. QuietCicada (talk) 13:09, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. QuietCicada (talk) 13:09, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete I also found a mention here, but it doesn't have much commentary on the game besides a general description of it. This seems like it's scooching up to the line but not crossing it. Normally I'd suggest merging to Sakevisual but I do not believe that may be notable either. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:43, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.