Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RJ Neary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:SNOW/speedy delete. BD2412 T 06:14, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RJ Neary

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local politician that didn't get elected for mayor in May 2021. This was sitting in draft multiple times with declines. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:22, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:22, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:22, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not pass WP:NPOL and not otherwise notable. Mccapra (talk) 19:37, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails NPOL. --- Possibly (talk) 20:12, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 21:07, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 21:07, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per the nomination. Pahiy (talk) 21:13, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom fails GNG. Okaye Agongo (talk) 15:18, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for standing as candidates in mayoral elections, but nothing here demonstrates that he had any preexisting notability for other reasons independently of an unsuccessful candidacy. Further, this was rejected at least three times at AFC for that very reason, but then the page creator bypassed the process by moving the page into mainspace himself, which people using the AFC process aren't allowed to do — and for added bonus, the creator has attempted to remove the AFD template from the article twice so far, which people also aren't allowed to do. Nothing stated here is grounds for a Wikipedia article at all. Bearcat (talk) 18:25, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Doesn't meet notability criteria. Fails NPOL. TheDreamBoat (talk) 13:11, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.