Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RMIT Music (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to RMIT Link. Daniel (talk) 22:02, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RMIT Music

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. Full of primary sources, and gnews has 2 hits. LibStar (talk) 23:12, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Sennecaster (Chat) 23:55, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Sennecaster (Chat) 23:55, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete doesn't meet WP:GNG and there are no sources on the web that would be more appropriate. Plus it seems like advertising. FiddleheadLady (talk) 15:22, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 12:04, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Selective merge and redirect to RMIT Link: There is already brief coverage on that target page. I am not seeing evidence that a distinct article is required. RMIT_Link#Music can be expanded to summarise the ensembles, locations and performances. AllyD (talk) 13:21, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge selectively to RMIT Link per above. Almost all the sources on this subject are WP:PRIMARY, but RMIT Link seems to be a reasonable place to WP:PRESERVE this information. Note that the RMIT Link article also could use some non primary coverage. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:26, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.