Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RP-S512
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Vanamonde93 (talk) 19:17, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- RP-S512 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm sure the creators are proud, but it's a pretty standard example of this kit plane, with a notable exception being (possibly) the first produced in its country.
In other words, there's no encyclopedic value, it does not pass WP:GNG. tedder (talk) 15:42, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Philippines. tedder (talk) 15:42, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: there is no WP:SIGCOV about this specific kit plane, so fails Wp:GNG. May or may not also be eligible for a speedy G5 per WP:BRV as creator is blocked as a sock. Didn't !vote that because I'm not sure we can say they're the only significant contributor. — Alien333 (what I did & why I did it wrong) 17:38, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG per Alien333's argument. SBKSPP (talk) 02:48, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.