Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RadioTux

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per an apparent WP:HEY. --jonny-m t 15:19, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RadioTux

Contested prod. Article fails to explain why this podcast out of so many thousands, is notable. No mention of awards or other honors that might establish it's notability. Zero 3rd party references. Rtphokie (talk) 12:20, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as insufficiently notable. No evidence of non-trivial coverage of subject by multiple, reliable, third-party published sources. Searches on both LexisNexis and Yahoo! News produce no results for this subject. — Satori Son 13:30, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do not delete I edited the article and put some refs on it. hope thats enough. also see the talk page. Savar (talk) 17:10, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jj137 (talk) 21:11, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:N. No mentions in reliable sources. Undeath (talk)
Keep after reading the German Wikipedia AFD discussions for this article here[1] and here[2] I'm ambivalent, but I'm inclined to keep it. I'm mindful of WP:N but it's a guideline rather than a policy, which means exceptions can be made when circumstances demand. In this case, I think they might.--S Marshall (talk) 23:53, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
keep, as: the original article wasn't really good, but it has been extended by translating content from german wikipedia which is much more precise on this topic, several sources have been added. Media coverage can be found in german media mainly. RadioTux is notable according WP:WEB as it indeed has notable sources, is not temporary (RadioTux exists constantly since 2001) and produces monthly radio shows for download (Radio on demand). This in mind RadioTux has been one of the sites introducing podcasting as this concept was new when the website and idea was born, podcasts came up later. Like Wikipedia RadioTux produces free content, available as radio shows (including free music), podcasts (single articles) and live programm on notable FOSS events. So after improving the article (which should go on further) I'd like to keep the article. --Manuel Schneider^(bla) (+/-) 05:51, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:22, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:23, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: the article in its current state fulfills the notability requirements, although it desperately needs to be proofread. Ironho lds 11:47, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.