Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radio Studio 54 Network

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:47, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Radio Studio 54 Network

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable enough Ecomt (talk) 13:48, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:58, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:58, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Appears to meet WP:NRADIO; it has transmitters in multiple Italian regions and originates programming. The article needs a rewrite for poor translation. Raymie (t • c) 08:40, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:07, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Appearance can apparently be deceptive. Fails NRADIO from the very beginning. if it verifiably meets through reliable sources. A search and what is on the article (a partyguide source and a dead link) in no way translates "presumed notability" to inherently notable. In fact, there is nothing in the partyguide source to verify any of the information the inline citation indicates but is just a photogallery. The subject fails Notability (media)#Primary criterion and WP:GNG. Otr500 (talk) 04:27, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Amkgp 💬 05:41, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:37, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete: Setting aside the concerns about notability (which I think have merit), I think there are verifiability issues with this article too. A significant portion of it is unsourced and we don't have sufficient support for the claims made. Those sources may well be out there but I haven't seen them/been able to find them. So I'm ok with deleting. DocFreeman24 (talk) 05:31, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Notability and verifiability problems. Kolma8 (talk) 08:12, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.