Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafhael Domingues
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 05:18, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Rafhael Domingues (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested on the grounds that he is signed to an MLS club that he has played pro matches. While true, none of the matches in which he has played were fully pro, and being signed to but not playing for a fully-pro club is explicitly excluded as a source of notability per WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:11, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:11, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Rafhina has played pro matches for fully pro team in Brazil, how can the Paranaense 1st Div. in Brazil not qualify, when USL etc in the USA qualifies. Additionally he scored two goals in an officially sanctioned pro match against another full pro side Iraty. The criteria may need to be re looked at. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.105.84.221 (talk • contribs) 02:23, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Absence of reliable sources on the List of fully pro leagues. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:11, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete but will get a Keep if he gets some playing time in a fully pro league. Worth watching for soccer fans. Phoenix and Winslow (talk) 13:47, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete soccer players in Brazil are usually famous, but that one does not seem to be notable to me. Campeonato Brasileiro Série C is actually not professional and not notable. Algébrico (talk) 20:36, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- I'm not an expert on the subject, but a google test wasn't impressive. I also couldn't find any WP:RS. I trust the nominator's judgment, while also echoing User:Phoenix and Winslow's statement that if he makes it into pro league, he can then get an article. Feedback ☎ 21:40, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 12:13, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 13:27, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.