Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raginald Paz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:05, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Raginald Paz

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not convinced that there's enough independent coverage to meet WP:NBIO - sources read like advertorials/paid PR.

Previously draftified [1] KH-1 (talk) 01:56, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This contained major enough copyvios for me to G12 it. I think it's borderline, but there are at least major copyvios if the G12 is not accepted. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 02:57, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I reduced the article to a stub – the opening sentence looks clean enough – and revision-deleted the copyvio. This AfD can remain open to reach a clear consensus about the subject's notability. ^Complex/_Rational 20:57, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:56, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:56, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ThisIsSeanJ (talk) 07:05, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't think he's notable, even in the Philippines. I looked for any news articles about him and there were practically none from any major news outlet. --- Tito Pao (talk) 08:38, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per reasons presented by Titopao. -Ian Lopez @ 16:30, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no reliable hits from Google News or Google News Archives --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:39, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.