Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramrod (herbicide)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep and move to Propachlor Cheers, I'mperator 15:38, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ramrod (herbicide) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is about an old product with little controversy or historical signifigance. Lifelonglego (talk) 23:21, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I added several inline references. 2.1 million pounds were used in the US annually during the 1980s and early 1990s, but it's now on the EPA's Toxics Release Inventory and the European Commission de-authorized it in 2008 (see article for refs). It should maybe be moved to Propachlor, its active ingredient, with a redirect from Ramrod. A search on propachlor gets about 3,340 hits in Gscholar [1]. Propachlor in US government sites gets 320 unique Web hits. [2] Novickas (talk) 16:45, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to Propachlor with redirect from original article name, as suggested. I think the refs provided show adequate notability. Plvekamp (talk) 02:46, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I didn't realize it was a historically significant herbicide. --Lifelonglego (talk) 02:06, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.