Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramse Mostoller

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — neuro^(talk) 13:45, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ramse Mostoller

I Prod-ed Ramse Mostoller as not notable several days ago... It was deproded and suggested I take it to Afd if I wanted. I am not sure why. A short conversation ensued at User talk:Oo7565#Deprod of Ramse Mostoller. Regards, Ariconte (talk) 03:18, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Wikipedia:CREATIVE#Creative_professionals: "The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, which has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." There's plenty of significant well-known works to go around and costumes are a major part of any production. - Mgm|^(talk) 14:49, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 03:08, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, speedily--this clearly establishes that this designer is incredibly notable. What she needs (well, what the article needs) is a sympathetic and knowledgeable writer, who can stick the overwhelming plethora of articles and book mentions into the article. I have called upon the master, MQS of ARS, and perhaps he'll be able to do that. But regardless of the article, the person is notable, no doubt about it. Please check Google News, Google Books, and then close this AfD. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 03:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Drmies.--S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 10:31, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Does meet notability in this niche. §FreeRangeFrog 21:06, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
SNOW Keep. Mgm says it all, as this person meets the notability inclusion requirements of WP:CREATIVE. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:47, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.