Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randy Pruett
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 19:55, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Randy Pruett (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional article, with no evidence of notability. All the references are either by Pruett, not about Pruett, or barely mention him. (NOTE: PROD contested with no reason given.) JamesBWatson (talk) 13:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Most of this is pretty much volunteer work, as near as I can tell, with the pageant organization -- the book is published by them, which to me confers no notability, and there are no arm's-length third-party sources of expert opinion to confer any either. His business efforts don't add anything to notability. Ubelowme (talk) 14:56, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete despite the following accomplishments: "historian for the Miss Texas pageant ... inducted into the 'Miss Texas Hall of Honor' for his years of volunteer service ... enters cooking contests for a hobby and has had several award winning recipes published." EEng (talk) 23:26, 20 June 2012 (UTC) Upon some of Cato's friends expressing their surprise, that while many persons without merit or reputation had statues, he had none; he answered, "I had much rather it should be asked why the people have not erected a statue to Cato, than why they have. -- Encyclopedia Brittanica (1797)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.