Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raquel Calderón

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Courcelles 17:22, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Raquel Calderón

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable individual; useful content may be used at her mother's article Raquel Argandoña. Her only album No Molestar! did not chart anywhere, and being the daughter of a well-known Chilean celebrity does not give her notability. Diego talk 03:20, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:54, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Reliable sources were present already, and I've added more. She's famous, she clearly passes WP:GNG. You can also take a look at No Molestar!. Sources have been added by now there too. Moscowconnection (talk) 04:30, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's strange, I saw the article before but I didn't notice it was nominated for deletion. Moscowconnection (talk) 11:39, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AFAIK, Speedy Keep only applies when there's a lot of keep votes in a row, which isn't the case here. Also, she's only famous for being the daughter of well-known Chilean celebrity Raquel Argandoña, not in her own right (well, clearly, being controversial may be is, but I'm not sure an encyclopedia should have an article for such persons, if so, we should have an article on Luli, Adriana Barrientos, Tanza Varela, Angie Alvarado, etc.) Diego talk 21:19, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was Snow Keep when there are overwhelming majority of Keep votes. And Speedy Keep when an article should definitely be kept and when a nomination seems to be a mistake. As a musical artist, Kel probably passes 1, 10, 11 of WP:MUSIC. But more importantly, I can see that there are many articles about her and she's a celebrity, for whatever reason. She passes WP:GNG, I can't see any reason why the article about her could be deleted. I can see you're an experienced editor, but I do think the nomination was a mistake. Moscowconnection (talk) 23:32, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As for others you mentioned, I don't know. es:Constanza Varela has only one role that might be notable by Wikipedia standards. It all depends on whether there are detailed articles about her. Moscowconnection (talk) 23:32, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. — Moscowconnection (talk) 04:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.