Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rasmus Andersson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Evidence that the subject meets WP:GNG has been presented herein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:21, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rasmus Andersson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai (talk) 02:55, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I've been able to find significant coverage of him here, here and here, plus less significant coverage such as [1], [2] and [3]. And none of these mention his 2nd team OHL all-star selection, which while not a factor in NHOCKEY may have also generated some coverage. Rlendog (talk) 13:46, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- There is also this which I can't open right now but from the headline appears like it could be relevant coverage. Rlendog (talk) 13:49, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Finally was able to open it and it doesn't add much. Rlendog (talk) 14:47, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Rlendog (talk) 15:38, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Rlendog (talk) 18:08, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 15:12, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as the reliable sources shown above indicate that WP:GNG is passed Atlantic306 (talk) 15:39, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Rlendog, sources show GNG if not NHOCKEY — crh ₂₃ (Talk) 16:45, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.