Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravertooth tiger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:58, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ravertooth tiger

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable record label. Fails NCORP and the GNG. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 20:37, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 20:38, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 20:38, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 20:38, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete No assertions of notability made in the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:39, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Grand total of zero Google News hits [1], and no reliable sources found with a broader search. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:42, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete-Nothing found to establish notability ABF99 (talk) 02:48, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable. ¡Boz zio! 15:36, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – A few searches have provided no coverage in reliable sources; fails WP:N. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:00, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not notable at all. -- Dane2007 ^talk 18:16, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.