Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reactions on the Cancellation of WITS Academy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:19, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reactions on the Cancellation of WITS Academy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the material in this article is unsourced, We certainly do not need a standalone article on this topic, as what little info is relevant can be added to the main WITS Academy page. Honestly though, this article seems to balance itself on a couple of tweets... talk about flaky sourcing. InsertCleverPhraseHere 10:11, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This article was created in conjunction with a series of vandalistic edits, each one adding several sports-team navboxes to an article on a children's television program. Frankly, the instant article probably could have been "G3" speedy-deleted as blatant vandalism and/or hoax. NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:23, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:25, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete under WP:G3 – this was created by what appears to be a vandalism-only account (that I'm shocked hasn't already been blocked as a vandalism-only account!). Anyway, not an independently notable topic – it would belong at WITS Academy if sourcing could be found for it (which it won't be...). --IJBall (contribstalk) 18:21, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribstalk) 18:22, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.