Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recharge (magazine)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recharge (magazine)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet notability guidelines - ie link to main info is by the company paid to launch/promote in 2013 ie http://garciamedia.com/blog/articles/precharge_the_renewable_energy_journal_gets_renewed_p quote: It is the third project launch for Garcia Media in 2013.

Other links were from primary sources, or blogs of employees. Remainder are a non-notable industry awards, and an association with a former CEO of a notable organisation, European Wind Energy Association, plus mentions of publications (single issue?) made for trade fairs -( NB have remove all primary and associated sources except garcia media info)

I couldn't find anything to show this new magazine is notable, though a web search is complicated by its common name. Prof.Haddock (talk) 17:27, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:54, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:54, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:55, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mr.Z-man 05:48, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wifione ^Message 07:57, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Randykitty (talk) 13:20, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.