Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rechon Black

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:37, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rechon Black

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCOLLATH. TM 18:46, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Rikster2 (talk) 18:58, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:09, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell me what is wrong with this and I will fix it. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by UNC2 (talk • contribs) 19:26, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There aren't enough independent, reliable sources that cover the subject in detail. Please read the policies I cited above.--TM 01:12, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:45, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Not seeing sources to meet WP:GNG or WP:NCOLLATH. It would not surprise me if he becomes notable in the future, but right now appears WP:TOOSOON. Rikster2 (talk) 14:12, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Rikster2. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:17, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per guideline WP:WHYN, We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources so that we can actually write a whole article, rather than half a paragraph or a definition of that topic. The coverage I am finding is mostly from high school and expectations entering his college freshman year. Writing anything beyond a WP:STUB at this point would require scraping for content that fails WP:NOTDIARY.—Bagumba (talk) 09:51, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Not notable, maybe it is WP:TOOSOON and he can be notable in the future, but for the moment he fails WP:GNG or WP:NCOLLATH. Alex-h (talk) 21:40, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.