Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Refusion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Soft delete as an uncontested PROD. :) ·Salvidrim!· ✉ 16:40, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Refusion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unreleased video game that does not pass WP:GNG - no multiple, in-depth coverage by independent reliable sources, like WP:VG/RS. I can only find a few directory entries, and a few developer posts/articles. There is no real world (WP:WAF) content in the article, only gamecruft, so this can be easily recreated if it becomes notable at some point. The article has existed for quite some time without any sources, and since then it has become more known, but hasn't passed the GNG. Disclaimer: My attention to this was brought by this game being listed with developer at List of indie game developers. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:17, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the new sources added, but unfortunatelly they are all primary sources or directory entries and thus unsuitable. [1] is a gameplay video, [2] is primary/directory listing, [3] is directory listing, [4] is an ad. The one I hadn't seen was [5], but it lists its source as press release. It could serve as a supporting reference, but none of these are WP:GNG sources, at least in my opinion. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 16:57, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^*poke* 03:33, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.