Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reining Creek Ranch
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splashtalk 23:53, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is an entry on a breeder of horses. If they were instrumental in defining or promoting a certain breed they ought to be kept, yet I see none of that here. Pilatus 16:54, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Reads like vanity / advertising. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmtux (talk • contribs)
- Keep, verifiable. JYolkowski // talk 18:49, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The parking meter in front of my house is verifiable, important to anyone who parks nearby, and utterly, utterly un-encyclopaedic. Pilatus 18:56, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Really? Point me to a book, newspaper article, website, or such about your parking metre. OTOH, there appear to be several web hits on this, and if I read periodicals about horses I could probably point to further references. JYolkowski // talk 19:04, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I get twelve unique Google hits on this outfit, none of them third-party reviews. Amongst other things, WP:NOT a business directory, advertising medium or propaganda vehicle. Yellowikis is down the hall, two doors on the right. Pilatus 19:17, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Really? Point me to a book, newspaper article, website, or such about your parking metre. OTOH, there appear to be several web hits on this, and if I read periodicals about horses I could probably point to further references. JYolkowski // talk 19:04, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The parking meter in front of my house is verifiable, important to anyone who parks nearby, and utterly, utterly un-encyclopaedic. Pilatus 18:56, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -- Dalbury(Talk) 23:28, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete ad for nn organisation. Grue 17:45, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As per nom. Malcolm Morley 07:57, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This entry does in fact promote and define very specific breed and bloodlines of high quality horses.
- Comment Please provide references for this claim. -- Dalbury(Talk) 00:44, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Have you visted the supporting websites? Do you have ANY knowledge of QuarterHorse and Paint bloodlines? The information seems self expanitory
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.