Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reshma Pasupuleti

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. This should not be re-listed a third time. The only strong arguments are those of the nominator and Atlantic306. Atlantic306's argument presumes to rebut that of the nominator, both the "no evidence" and the "not a lead actress" claims. However, no further discussion on the merits took place, so therefore I deem consensus to remain un-reached. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 22:24, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reshma Pasupuleti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. She is not a lead actress or second lead actress. The Times is a gossip column between her and her cousin brother Bobby Simha. Fails WP:GNG  DragoMynaa  Talk   17 November 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 07:48, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 07:48, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:16, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:16, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:16, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:23, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:36, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.