Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resurrection (Michael Jackson album)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:41, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
An orphan article full of speculation about an unreleased album. Seems to be an opinion piece/fancruft rather than a serious article. kingboyk 17:51, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no references, first 50 Google Hits for Michael Jackson Resurrection give nothing creditable, this is somewhere between WP:V & WP:NOT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitaphane (talk • contribs)
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Baseball,Baby! balls•strikes 01:54, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with fire. I've never seen an article that contained the word "rumor" this many times. I think the only thing verifiable in the entire article is that there is, in fact, a singer named Michael Jackson. Fan-1967 02:14, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete How did this go unnoticed for so long? Dennette 03:58, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Mitaphane and Fan. Joe 04:34, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per everyone. hateless 06:54, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. On Wikipedia, you need valid sources in articles. This is not some gossip column in People Magazine. (or whatever people read these days) --Nishkid64 21:00, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The words "crystal ball" come to mind. Molerat 17:10, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.