Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rich Julius

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:07, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rich Julius

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Man with a job. Subject doesn't appear to be notable. WP:NOTCV PepperBeast (talk) 17:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and California. PepperBeast (talk) 17:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ireland, Michigan, New Jersey, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:27, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The sources in the article are all associated with the subject. Many do not even mention the subject - and appear to be added to support other loosely related text and bolster "notability by association" claims. A search in other sources (like Irish Independent and Irish Times) returns nothing at all. The WP:COI and WP:PROMO overtones are also difficult to ignore. Guliolopez (talk) 19:23, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Guliolopez. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 12:26, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Guliolopez - Spleodrach (talk) 17:45, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.