Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Attig
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 00:59, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Rick Attig (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Tagged for speedy deletion for notability issues. I do not know much about the field of journalism however this persons seems to have a number of awards, according to the article, which may make him notable? Even know the parents "Knights Fellowship" article is non notable and was deleted. SGGH speak! 00:25, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep It says he is an editorial writer and I know editorials are a big part of a newspaper and that the newspaper he writes for is a very big newspaper in Oregon (it has its own article, by the way, if you need more info). I might be wrong and there might be fifty editorial writers, making him not necessarily notable, but I still think the article deserves some sort of fighting chance. Parent5446(Murder me for my actions) 00:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Definite Keep - Guy won the Pulitzer as shown here [1]. That in itself establishes notability. However, agree with nominator - article is definitely in need of a rewite. Shoessss | Chat 00:46, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Pulitzer confirmation, article still needs a re-write and I'm not familiar enough to do so. Travellingcari (talk) 01:15, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. some pole-vaulter with the same name gets in the way of his ghits, but his confirmed awards make him notable. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:28, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.