Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Israel Shinn
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Robert Israel Shinn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I redirected this article to 7M Films but it was reverted. The subject of this article does not seem to be notable outside of his company 7M nor the documentary about this company (Dancing for the Devil: The 7M TikTok Cult). Mbdfar (talk) 16:11, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Entertainment, Management, Religion, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:22, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that the subject might not be notable enough to warrant an independent page, but I felt that your redirect removed information that made the article more complete. I apologize if reverting was the wrong course of action. Could it be possible to merge all 3 articles on the subject (7M Films, Robert Israel Shinn, and Dancing for the Devil: The 7M TikTok Cult) together? Cowlan (talk) 16:29, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 22:41, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The article has no encyclopedic relevance The content of the article is not encyclopedic, it is poorly written and the content is not at all relevant. Alon9393 (talk) 13:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.