Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RoboCop (2014 soundtrack)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to RoboCop (2014 film)#Music. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:06, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RoboCop (2014 soundtrack)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pointless content fork, RoboCop (2014 film) is not that big an article and didn't need the sound track split out of it. I've reverted back the main article and consider that an unnecessary WP:CONTENTFORK. On it's own it doesn't really qualify under WP:BASIC. Govvy (talk) 08:50, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've just noticed that I was reverted, again upon outcome of this AfD, would suggest a restoration on article. I don't understand why you call it clutter. Govvy (talk) 08:53, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Govvy (talk) 08:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Govvy (talk) 09:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Govvy (talk) 09:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to RoboCop (2014 film)#Music per nomination. Soundtrack article doesn't even show independent notability at this point anyway. Movie Wave is a single-author blog and I have no idea what consensus there is on Film Music Reporter but it doesn't look much better to me. The other three are so obvious I don't even need to explain them. If that's the best coverage this soundtrack got (note that I haven't searched for any more coverage) then it should've never been split in the first place. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 13:25, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect, search is pulling up absolutely nothing. Mach61 (talk) 21:45, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.