Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rok Zorko

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Regardless of the did he / didn't he pass NFOOTY arguments, the consensus is that the player still fails GNG. Fenix down (talk) 09:02, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rok Zorko

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFOOTY, not played in a fully-pro league. Snowflake91 (talk) 09:22, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Yes, he did, he played in Slovenian PrvaLiga with Zavrč. Ludost Mlačani (talk) 09:25, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And? 1. SNL is a semi-pro league, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues Snowflake91 (talk) 09:32, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:15, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:15, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:34, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SNL is professional league, but you removed it from the list and deleted my source. Ludost Mlačani (talk) 10:56, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was removed by User:S.A. Julio over a year ago, because both UEFA and NZS sources (2019 version, not 2008 version) says that the league is not fully-pro. Snowflake91 (talk) 11:05, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Which source clearly states that the league is semi-pro? Ludost Mlačani (talk) 11:21, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And which clearly states that the league is fully-pro? Not UEFA or NZS source from 2019. Snowflake91 (talk) 11:45, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But you listed the league under not fully-pro, even though no source clearly indicates that. And why should it be from 2019? For most leagues on the list there are older sources. Ludost Mlačani (talk) 12:04, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The place to discuss whether or not the league is FPL or not is Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues, and I recommend you take that discussion there (there are usually a few people active on that page). I would start with working on demonstrating WP:GNG because without any references I don't see the article meeting that in its current state. Jay eyem (talk) 01:53, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 14:16, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Agree that discussion over status of FPL is for WT:FPL, nowt AFD. Giant Snowman 14:20, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nobody comments on it there. If I put it back on the list with sources, it will be just removed again. Ludost Mlačani (talk) 15:38, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – I cannot find significant coverage to satsfy GNG. There is some coverage of a youth coach named Rok Zorko [1] [2], but I'm finding little coverage of the footballer born in 1993, just routine mentions in game reports like [3] and [4]. – Levivich 20:30, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Regardless of the FPL status of DNŠ Zavrč, our subject simply doesn't pass GNG - I'm not finding much. Icewhiz (talk) 07:34, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.