Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RookChat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:15, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RookChat

I can't find any reliable sources that notability. It was nominated for VFD in 2004 and the result was keep. For some reason, the discussion got moved to the talk page of the article. Iowateen (talk) 05:29, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I see no non-trivial mentions and the article hasn't had a significant edit since 2005. No assertion of importance or significance. On the talk page at the VfD in 2004 someone said it was used on the "popular" site rinkworks but Rinkworks was deleted on March 19, 2009. Drawn Some (talk) 08:24, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep with thoughts that WP:NTEMP and in its heyday, it had notability. Suggest a request for experts be sent out, as I do not have access to computer coding languages software magazines or journals. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:30, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep, still maintained open source project, and as User:MichaelQSchmidt states, notable in its heyday. JIP | Talk 09:52, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or userfy per lack of established notability, and nor can I find any. If it is, it needs to be shown and not presumed that some pseudo-source exists. MuZemike 18:48, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This one may not be an easy one to clean up but there should still be something to work from. Tothwolf (talk) 16:43, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.