Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roses, Kings, Castles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Adam Ficek. --jonny-m t 15:10, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Roses, Kings, Castles

It's just a man, his guitar and his Myspace page. I don't think this little side project should have it's own article. What there is to be said about "Roses Kings Castles" can be said in the article about Adam Ficek. (However, I'm not even sure if HE is notable enough in his own right for an own article). Malfacteur (talk) 07:28, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Merge the lot, lock, stock & barrel into the Adam Ficek page. While the ref's do allow WP:MUSIC#C1 to be met, the manchestereveningnews.co.uk one would be better served in Adams article than this one, as the only mention of Roses, Kings, Castles is a trivial one right at the end. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 08:11, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jj137 (talk) 21:14, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Adam Ficek per above. May want to consider having Roses, Kings, Castles redirect to the Ficek page. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 22:24, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:19, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think the page should remain open but requires a bit of a tidy up. I believe it should stay open because Roses, Kings, Castles is a band in its own right with an album coming out very soon - you can pre-order it on amazon. DannyYoung (talk) 19:30, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Well, even though I was the one who nominated this article for deletion, meanwhile I came to the conclusion it would be better to merge it with the article about Adam Ficek. There's in fact an album coming out soon and it can in fact be already pre-ordered. However, "Roses Kings Castles" is not a band, it's just Adam Ficek. So there's no need for an own article. Malfacteur (talk) 21:07, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with consensus to Merge - makes sense. --Alinnisawest(talk) 01:15, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.