Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royal and Hashemite Order of the Pearl
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:42, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Royal and Hashemite Order of the Pearl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
While the Sultanate is likely notable, this award is not. The sourcing does not support any notability. The Sultante of Sulu: Notes From the Past and Present Times report is from an employee of the Sultanate; the El Sultanato de Sulú y la Real y Hachemita Orden de la Perla source is from someone receiving the Grand Cordon of this award; the Memorandum and Succession sources are not about this award, or even mention it; the Notable Members of the Order and Heraldry sources are self-published from the award; and the American Institute of Polish Culture source is a one-mention blurb about someone who received the award. In all, it's puffery/promo masquerading as a notable subject from the org itself, employees, recipients, or just mere mentions. Greens vs. Blacks (talk) 18:47, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. Greens vs. Blacks (talk) 18:48, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Greens vs. Blacks (talk) 18:49, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:28, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 08:57, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.