Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rufio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Deathphoenix ʕ 14:07, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rufio

Non-notable per WP:MUSIC Nv8200p talk 03:59, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no assertion of notability AdamBiswanger1 04:25, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't realize they were on the Warped Tour, so I'll change my vote to Keep. (Even though each Warped Tour features 100+ bands. AdamBiswanger1 20:58, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Concur with above. Notability is missing. Interlingua ^talk 05:32, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Recordings and tours add up to notability. TruthbringerToronto 05:57, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep Article states that they were on a national tour (Warped Tour) and they meet others of the notability criteria. Tag the article to have notability asserted instead of deleting it. fuzzy510 06:21, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete Doesn't quite reach acceptable levels of notability or WP:MUSIC.--Auger Martel 07:39, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Clear keep. Released two full albums on Nitro Records, and they did appear on Warped Tour (see [1]). Notability is asserted. Punkmorten 07:52, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Content seems fine to me. David L Rattigan 10:33, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Seem notable. Just came across this page after seeing a music clip on Australian TV. Cedars 16:27, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Very strong keep, plenty of media attention, charting, and touring. --badlydrawnjeff talk 17:12, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. plentiful references in several mainstream music papers, also per Punkmorten W guice 18:34, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep Absolutely a notable band, if for nothing else besides touring and being on a notable record label. Plus, unlike 99.9% of bands with articles on WP, I've heard of them. -- Kicking222 23:10, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Badlydrawnjeff. King rich 13:52, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. This deletion is a joke, there is no point to delete this article. They’re a real band that tours and have a nice fan base. DidYouLoseASock 19:26, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, couple of albums on notable indie labels and a well established tour. Good enough for me per WP:MUSIC. Rockpocket 06:35, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable enough. WesleyDodds 07:34, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.