Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rupa Shanmugam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. There's no true consensus, but closing this as NC would keep something in mainspace which most people agree shouldn't be there. Draft seems like a reasonable compromise. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:20, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rupa Shanmugam

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find information that would meet WP:GNG. Her company does not have a WP article either. Britishfinance (talk) 21:55, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:09, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:19, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:19, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There are several independent sources and so the subject passes WP:GNG. Andrew D. (talk) 11:03, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:38, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Move to draft to provide time for evidence of the notability of this subject to develop. If no improvement is made in due time, the draft will be abandoned and deleted as such. bd2412 T 03:13, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:11, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The sources found or cited are quite poor, and certainly do not meet WP:NPERSON or even WP:GNG: NYS Women Inc is a women's support group that has simply put up subject's cv; the New Strait Times piece is pure advertorial, with a link to the NYS Women Inc cv; and Ipoh Echo is a small local newspaper at Perak. This is just trivial coverage. Let's be gracious and call it a case of WP:TOOSOON. -The Gnome (talk) 10:59, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.