Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russian Grids

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep — withdrawn by nominator.I am One of Many (talk) 20:46, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Russian Grids

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was created by the sockmaster User:Edson Rosa. They have created many non-notable companies. This article has no sources establishing notability and I could find no substantial coverage establishing notability. I recognize that language could be an issue in establishing notability, so if this company is regionally, perhaps someone can find an independent reliable source. I am One of Many (talk) 18:43, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:48, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:48, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As I told you on your talk page, this one was not worth nominating. It's a state-sponsored energy utility with 190 thousand employees! It's an absolute behemoth. Just because you haven't found (or haven't looked, more likely) for sources, doesn't mean you can assume something does not have substantial coverage... give me a break with this nom. There is more coverage than you can shake a stick at. -- Y not? 20:05, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Ok, I concede your point. I'll withdraw it and close it.I am One of Many (talk) 20:19, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.