Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S.E.N.S.I.B.L.E. Choice
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted by User:Steve Smith under criterion G7. (Non-admin closure) "Pepper" @ 23:52, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- S.E.N.S.I.B.L.E. Choice (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
One-off lobby group whose notability is limited to a single municipal election in a single small city, and relying entirely on deadlinked primary sources for referencing. While it's not impossible for organizations of primarily "local to a single city" notability to qualify for Wikipedia articles, that takes a lot more than being able to minimally source the fact that they existed — it takes writing an article that's substantive enough and sourced enough to pass WP:ORG. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 14:50, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: no coverage at all. Esquivalience t 15:12, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 16:31, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 17:38, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 17:38, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:ORG. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 17:39, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as creator (long, long, ago). Steve Smith (talk) 17:41, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Maybe do a WP:CSD#G7? Esquivalience t 18:10, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- I do appear to have been the only significant contributor, so done. Steve Smith (talk) 22:15, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Maybe do a WP:CSD#G7? Esquivalience t 18:10, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.