Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SCDA Architects

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:18, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

SCDA Architects

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

SCDA Architects (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unclear where notability lies here. This is a firm or architects so its not surprising to find sources about buildings where they are mentioned - that is what is expected. However, these references do not discuss the firm of architects, except in passing, it is the buildings and developers they discuss. This appears to be a competent firm of architects who are not yet notable in Wikipedia terms. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   09:44, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:09, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:09, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:27, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 11:03, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:00, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete I don't think they are particularly notable. The sources are name drops. Fails WP:NCORP. scope_creep^Talk 15:38, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.