Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SCG industries

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete by Dank. (non-admin closure) MrKIA11 (talk) 23:17, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SCG industries

I first declined the speedy and prodded; based on talk page comments, I'm proposing we speedy as db-hoax. Taking to AfD so that we can nail this down, and G4 in the future if necessary. - Dank (push to talk) 14:14, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. - Dank (push to talk) 14:18, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as fishy and unverifiable. Their supposed homepage [1] is a subpage of a IT company with a text-only webpage. The person claiming to have had an interview there on the article's talk page is in all likelyhood a sockpuppet: that's their only activity on Wikipedia. Article claims that SCG's "primary income is from patent royalties", but a quick patent search shows no US patents issued to any company by that name. There's a Canadian company called SCG Industries and they don't claim to be in Antarctica (or Cambridge). If you're gonna pull off a hoax, people, you gotta put a little more effort into it. Hairhorn (talk) 15:03, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Going for an A7 on this one - I can find no evidence beyond WP on this one on Google. At all. --63.64.30.2 (talk) 20:24, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete for lack of notability in reliable sources. It's a likely hoax or fiction. DreamGuy (talk) 20:36, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Okay, that's 4-0 for speedy, plus the suggestion on the article talk page that this is a hoax, so I'll go ahead and speedy. I prefer not to close when I'm involved with the speedy, and I wouldn't mind leaving this open for 24 hours to see if there's any significant debate. - Dank (push to talk) 21:07, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note Article and talk page are now deleted, and the article talk page is reproduced on the talk page of this AfD. I'll be happy to re-create the article itself somewhere if anyone needs to see it. - Dank (push to talk) 21:11, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now there's also SCG Base -- same problems. DreamGuy (talk) 21:52, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I got it. - Dank (push to talk) 22:08, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.