Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SCP & CIO
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was deleted by User:RHaworth. (Non-admin closure) "Pepper" @ 13:44, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- SCP & CIO (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Sort of a WP:DICTDEF and it fails to indicate why the acronym exists. In the absence of some explanation regarding the significance of the acronym, I don't see a purpose in retaining it. Monty845 06:41, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as dictionary definition. Can disambiguate both at their respective abbreviations, if it meets the dab criteria of course. Shadowjams (talk) 14:46, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6. This article was apparently created due to a typo. It is called "SCP & CIO" but it is apparently about the combined abbreviation "SVP & CIO". The "V" in the abbreviation was replaced by a "C" in the title. There is already an article under the correct name SVP & CIO which is itself unnecessary for the reasons stated by the nom and Shadowjams, and is itself currently up for proposed deletion. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:23, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.