Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMK Seri Kembangan
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. The Delete views carry more P&G weight than the Keeps. But even after four weeks, the Delete views failed to achieve quorum, let alone consensus. Owen× ☎ 16:13, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- SMK Seri Kembangan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article does not satisfy Wikipedia's general notability guidelines ; most of the secondary sources cited are paid materials by Multimedia University (see WP:SPIP.) N niyaz (talk) 10:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Malaysia. Shellwood (talk) 10:20, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 July 8. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:21, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Since I cited most of the secondary sources in the article. I would like to ask the nominator for deletion N niyaz, is it possible to list some of the secondary sources that you claimed are paid materials by Asia Pacific University? KjjjKjjj (talk) 11:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Okay @KjjjKjjj I made a little mistake there, what I meant was Multimedia University. Also the school receives no significant coverage and most of the sources are just mentions. Unfortunately what's best is to make it a redirect.
- https://www.wilayahku.com.my/smk-seri-permaisuri-antara-13-sekolah-angkat-mmu/
- https://sinarbestari.sinarharian.com.my/ipt/sekolah-angkat-mmu-persiapkan-pelajar-ke-arah-digitalisasi N niyaz (talk) 13:36, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- @N niyaz: If I'm not mistaken and correct me If I'm wrong, both of the sources you said have no mention of being paid. KjjjKjjj (talk) 14:26, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- @KjjjKjjj You could already tell by the topic and style of the writing that it is a press release/paid article. Trying to find a paid article disclaimer in the sources is just stupid. N niyaz (talk) 06:00, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- @N niyaz: If I'm not mistaken and correct me If I'm wrong, both of the sources you said have no mention of being paid. KjjjKjjj (talk) 14:26, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Multiple secondary sources, passes WP:NOTABILITY at it's barest. KjjjKjjj (talk) 14:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:38, 15 July 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:28, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak delete. Checked the sources listed in English. None of them provide significant coverage, just mentions or sponsored content/press releases. Cannot check sources in Malay, hence weak. Tried to find some more coverage for this article, but failed. Vorann Gencov (talk) 15:28, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. I disagree that "Trying to find a paid article disclaimer in the sources is just stupid", online content often includes a statement when it is sponsored content.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:38, 29 July 2024 (UTC)- Although often it's not mandatory for them to declare it. The article
- https://www.wilayahku.com.my/smk-seri-permaisuri-antara-13-sekolah-angkat-mmu/
- https://sinarbestari.sinarharian.com.my/ipt/sekolah-angkat-mmu-persiapkan-pelajar-ke-arah-digitalisasi
- is obviously a press release and not a reliable source. N niyaz (talk) 10:16, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. The school has high Chinese student number which is special as this school is unacknowledged by Chinese association.[1][2] A search of "史里肯邦安国中" on Google showed some Chinese newspapers. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 10:37, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- How does that even make it special? LIKE I STRESSED, there is no significant coverage on the school, it isn't notable, and most of the sources cited is a press release/paid article. N niyaz (talk) 08:44, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ "【暖势力】放下藤条感化"坏学生"．戴庆义改变问题国巾". Sin Chew Daily (in Chinese). Retrieved July 7, 2024.
- ^ "筹建多元化讲堂 史中盼华社援手". 东方日报 [Oriental Daily News (Malaysia)] (in Chinese (Malaysia)). 2017-06-23. Retrieved 2024-08-04.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.