Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SNEAKO

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Editors are encouraged to continue improving sourcing for the existing draft, and to go through AfC to avoid returning to AfD. Owen× ☎ 22:39, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SNEAKO

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Internet personality whose only real claim to fame is being a gadfly. BEFORE returns mostly Sportskeeda gossip (centred mainly on feuds with other online personalities sparked by his hot takes), and practically nothing of use for notability (string: sneako). Sources in the article don't help a whit for notability, mainly due to being more of the same clickbait "news" as found in search. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 19:22, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Entertainment, Internet, and New York. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:31, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Guardian, MMA Junkie, Pink News, Pink News Sources found with User:Superb Owl/Reliable Source Engine. ~~Keep~~, though this article needs a lotta work to incorporate these sources. Aaron Liu (talk) 20:01, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Replace with mainspace article per मल्ल. @Oaktree b: I fail to see how a seven-paragraph introduction to the topic of "heterodoxy" using Sneako as a case study is "just a mention", not to mention the plethora of sources the introduction links to. While Pink News and MMA aren't the ideal sources, they all satisfy WP:SIGCOV with flying colors. Hence, I now believe that the article should be deleted, but with an endorsement of its notability and a move of the draft article to mainspace. Aaron Liu (talk) 21:19, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sneako is only mentioned once in the article. That source is better for an article on "heterodoxy", not as a main source for Sneako. Oaktree b (talk) 14:24, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are we looking at the same article? I see it dedicating 7 paragraphs. Per SIGCOV, [s]ignificant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material. Plus, again, I provided other, very valid sources as well. Aaron Liu (talk) 14:41, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not much of anything in RS... A mention here [1]. The Guardian above is also just a mention. The rest aren't showing notability. We don't have enough for this online personality/streamer. Oaktree b (talk) 20:16, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:19, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:BIO. A better sourced draft already exists at Draft:Sneako. Relevant material can be merged there but the mainspace article should be deleted. मल्ल (talk) 20:31, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The articles referenced in the mainspace article are enough to keep this in the mainspace. Please read all the references carefully and thoroughly. inaquout (talk) 19:01, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your argument as article creator would have more sway if you told us which specific sources provide notability. Aaron Liu (talk) 19:03, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.