Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SQ/200

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 06:48, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SQ/200 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This looks like a direct translation of El Rubius. Popularity is not an indicator of notability and fails WP:GNG. Soetermans. T / C 08:31, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The Spanish Wikipedia article you link to has numerous references to Spanish newspapers like El País, El Mundo, and La Vanguardia which appear to cover him. I don't speak Spanish, so I am not in a position to judge whether these sources are significant coverage per GNG, can you explain why they aren't? 109.76.247.193 (talk) 12:33, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as this channel doesn't look relevant to the English wikipedia, not to mention how much work the article would need. --Kiyoshiendo (talk) 02:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:11, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, clpo13(talk) 00:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.