Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S v Melani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:38, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

S v Melani

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Totally unsourced, fails WP:GNG. Mako001 (talk) 09:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Mako001 (talk) 09:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Mako001 (talk) 09:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There is some coverage (see note 95 on this page) but nothing substantial enough to write an article about the case. CommonLII gives me 14 hits for the complete citation of this case - S v Melani 1996 1 SACR 335 (E) - so not looking like a very important one after all. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 14:20, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.