Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sacix (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ✗plicit 01:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sacix

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. References don't work Imcdc (talk) 13:05, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 13:05, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 13:05, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Did you not try the Internet Archive bot for the dead links? It isn't working for me right now, but this should be a part of WP:BEFORE. jp×g 21:51, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - nominator cites fixable problems that should have been resolved via WP:BEFORE (which is about more than just trusting your gut feeling about whether something is notable or not). St★lwart¹¹¹ 05:15, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 14:35, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is going to be hard to "fix", not sure exactly what you are proposing. At least I do not speak Portuguese, so might have trouble finding sources. I would have proposed a merge into Debian Pure Blend since this article says Sacix is one, but the pure blend article says Sacix is not a pure blend, with no source! I would lean to delete, but we could also declare no consensus. W Nowicki (talk) 22:18, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:20, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.