Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sadat Rahman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:00, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sadat Rahman

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG -a non-notable entrepreneur. –Cupper52^Discuss! 20:14, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 20:21, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 20:21, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sadat Rahman won the International Children's Peace Prize in 2020. This topic has received significant coverage in Bangladeshi and international media. I have added 13 references so far and all of them are reliable. Multiple sources state that Sadat Rahman is a social entrepreneur. So, I think it passes WP:GNG -a notable entrepreneur.--Knw360 (talk) 13:12, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Knw360: As the article creator you are usually expected to vote keep. –Cupper52^Discuss! 13:26, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Please note User cupper is not following the guidelines. He is simply nominating the articles without doing proper WP:Before. He only took 1 minute to nominate this for deletion after his last edit. Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 13:30, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's too bad that this is so short, but I do see personal coverage in reliable sources here. FalconK (talk) 06:19, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:35, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - enough sourcing to pass WP:GNG for this BLP. Kolma8 (talk) 22:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appeared even on BBC: [[1]]. Kolma8 (talk) 22:16, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:GNG. SpareSeiko (talk) 18:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.