Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sakib Ahmed a.k.a S.A.Q
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was A7 Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:43, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sakib Ahmed a.k.a S.A.Q (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I really don't think this article passes WP:MUSIC or especially WP:BIO. There are no sources, and when I tried to Google for some myself, all I could find for a person by this individual's same name is an unrelated football player (that, and a Facebook profile that might be the same guy). I also wonder if the article's creator, Sakmac, is the subject of the article. (And no disrespect intended, but I also find it hard to believe that an admin looked at this article but didn't suspect anything. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 19:03, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
G3 Blatant hoax. Someone who's collaborated with Eminem would surely turn up more than Facebook hits. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:18, 20 May 2009 (UTC)A7 My bad, I misread. Anyway, nowhere in the article does it assert notability per WP:MUSIC. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:40, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- speedy. "One upcoming album", "one upcoming single". This is nowhere close to passing WP:MUSIC. If this deletion process had not been started I would have speedily deleted it. DJ Clayworth (talk) 20:42, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a hoax as it doesn't say that the artist has collaborated with Eminem, and is about an up an coming artist, and a future release, as has been clearly labelled. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.104.56.204 (talk) 20:22, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.